THE NEW RABBI
June 13, 2003
Rabbi Edward Paul Cohn
Temple Sinai
New Orleans, Louisiana
Three years ago:
"So what do you do?" the man asks as we join our table mates on the
first night of the cruise.
"I'm a rabbi."
"Did you hear that, honey? Everyone, did you hear what this fellow
is? He's a Jewish rabbi. Honey, what was their name, the Jewish people
from Kansas who were on the cruise we took through the Canal, or was it
the Alaska trip? Anyway, their name was Abrams or maybe Abramson, and
he was in the hardware business somewhere in the Topeka area. Do you
know them by any chance? They weren't too fond of their rabbi, I do
remember that!
"By the way, now that we're going to be together here for a week,
maybe you could explain those kosher laws to us and, hey, why is you all
don't celebrate Mass? Honey, look, it's a Jewish rabbi and his wife. You are
allowed to marry, aren't you?"
One Year Ago
"So what do you do?" the man asks as we join our table mates on the
first night of the cruise.
"I'm a mortician and embalmer."
"Oh. Say, would you pass the salad dressing?"
Jews and non-Jews alike are often intrigued by the title "Rabbi" and
by the lifestyle of the rabbinate. We're exotic somehow. Non-Jews often
hold us in awe. Jews are more often curious and sometimes reverentially
sympathetic: "What kind of job is that after all? He could have become a
doctor. She should have become a lawyer."
Sometimes we're given a break by our fellow Jews who are simply
overwhelmed by the reality of the rabbi's lot in life. "Imagine," they say,
"having to please 900 bosses."
In his book, The New Rabbi: A Congregation Searches for Its Leader,
investigative reporter Stephen Fried intensely probes and records the
exhausting process of finding a successor for Rabbi Gerald Wolpe who, after
30 years, is stepping down as Rabbi of Philadelphia's Main Line Synagogue,
Har Zion.
Fried's book amounts really to three compelling stories in one. First,
there's the detailed account of the three-year search for the "new" rabbi for
one of America's premier Conservative congregations.
Ironically, their distinguished rabbi, Gerald Wolpe, had been the
author's beloved boyhood rabbi in Harrisburg 30 years earlier, and Mr. Fried
was able to gain the rabbi's cooperation in documenting the search for his
successor.
Unfortunately, he was unable to win access to meetings of the Har
Zion Rabbinic Search Committee. They got together to exclude him,
regardless of Rabbi Wolpe's recommendation. Fried was able to follow
most, if not all, of the complicated turns of fortune with the help of a few
well-placed committee moles and his own exceptional schmoozing abilities.
In what every Jew knows to be one of the great understatements of all
time, the author confides:
It has been my experience that Jews are not really good at
keeping secrets.
Well, for three years, Stephen Fried attended services, interviewed all of the
synagogue's staff members and anyone else who would talk with him, and
kept his ears open by the chopped liver on the kiddush table every Shabbat
morning!
You name it, Fried covered it: holy days, sermons, funerals,
Sisterhood meetings, and the every day dramas of schul life, and the many
developments and disappointments along the way of the Rabbinic search
process. He even went incognito to visit the applicants in their home
settings and, , evaluated their prospects. So that is the first story that Mr.
Fried focuses upon.
The second is a novel-like account of the loss and love between a
father and a son. Raised without much connection to his Judaism, Stephen
Fried was rediscovering his roots in the course of saying the daily Kaddish
prayer for this year after his father's death. So what one reads in his book is
as much a personal search for religious meaning as it is a communal search
for rabbinic leadership.
Here, by the way, Mr. Fried renders a valuable service to any of his
readers who know little if anything of basic Judaism: Jewish ceremonies,
holidays, prayers, and history. He carefully addresses all of these. In
addition, we learn ad nauseam of Fried's attachment to Conservative
Judaism, its Jewish Theological Seminary, and the Rabbinical Assembly.
What little he does write in reference to our Reform movement is either
snidely negative or outrageously inaccurate. Shame on him!
This leads us to his third story-the state of American Judaism and that
of American religion as a whole.
According to Stephen Fried, when a congregation self-scrutinizes itself
(in all of its demographic camps) so deeply as to ascertain what it wants and
needs in a new rabbi, that questioning will inevitably lead one into
examining all of the transformations in the culture affecting both religion
and religious institutions.
What does it mean, for instance, that half of the Har Zion members
wanted to be able to call their new rabbi by his first name, unthinkable with
Rabbi Wolpe? The other half insists they call to their synagogue a rabbi who
is nothing less than a great orator-national figure and scholar. And here
again Fried asks his readers:
The question is whether baby boomers and generations
after them want their clergy to be as dress-casual as the rest of
thier lives, or whether the significant return to religion in the
1990s is made up of people who will ultimately desire more
formality. . . .
[Har Zion] is the synagogue of record, where somebody
who wants to belong to the right synagogue belongs.
And yet, as Fried makes clear, these days, no has to belong to the "right"
synagogue or for that matter any synagogue. A Jew can be successful in
law, business, politics, or any other field without a synagogue affiliation.
Synagogues today attract the Jews who wish to stay in touch with their
tradition, not necessarily those who need to.
Well, since this book, The New Rabbi, reads like a good novel, I won't
give away its ending. But instead, as this is the beginning of my 30th year in
the Rabbinate, let me conclude with some personal thoughts on rabbis-old
or new!
The rabbi's role has never been more complex or demanding than it is
today. It seems to me that this is the congregational rabbi's challenge:
to summon that humanizing skill and responsiveness to others
which will overarch the institution, and create an unbreachable
relationship between the individual Jew and his/her Judaism,
and thus preserve the function of the synagogue as the primary
vehicle for Jewish spiritual survival.
Now that's a mouthful, I know. But no mortal man or woman can
meet such expectations 24/7. The rabbinate offers a rich life of service, but
it's a job is never done and one is rarely truly "off." And sometimes
expectations are too rigorous and unfair.
- The lady who will tell you she's a member of your flock,
- But never comes to Temple, though she lives around the block;
- The member who complains he's paying far too much in dues;
- He only comes two days a year, and then wants book reviews.
- The trustee who claims that every service is too long
- And wants the Temple to install a sermon-timing gong;
- The sad, misplaced traditionalist who seems to get such joy
- From telling everybody that the rabbi is a goy.
It's things like these that put you in a mood to rave and shout,
They're all of them the things a rabbi could do well without!
You get the idea. The modern rabbi cannot become the vicarious
Jewish community either. One man or women cannot, time and again,
pinch-hit for the entire Jewish community. We cannot be for long the
solitary pray-er, study-er, planner, visitor, dreamer for an entire
congregation-not a living one anyway.
And yet, we rabbis are great and unquenchable lovers and apologists
for our people. We learn that where synagogue life is concerned, some
things are simply not measured by the pound. Give us a couple of people to
sit beside us at a table-the Saving Remnant, if you like-with whom to study
and delight in the majestic gems of our peoples' wisdom, and we are once
again enthusiastic and happy.
In the end, it was the saintly Rabbi Leo Baeck, the faithful shepherd of
Berlin Jewry in its last tortured hours, who best expressed the rabbi's
essential duty when he said in language appropriate to those times long
before women were ordained:
The message is not the sermon of the preacher but the man
himself. The man [the woman] must be the message. The rabbi
must not deliver a message; he must deliver himself.
The rabbinate-the new Rabbi, or the older one. What kind of a job is
it for a Jewish boy or girl? Why, it's a sacred calling! It's a precious honor!
It's more than making a living. It's making a life!
Amen.